For those of you who are not familiar with the world of comic
books and superheroes, I apologize in advance before I go off the deep end and
completely nerd out.
Upon finishing the play, I didn't know what to make of King Lear.
I found the play long, confusing, complicated and muddled. Being an a lover of
movies, I always use cinema as a way of trying to make sense when nothing else
seems to work. I found myself on a trip down memory lane recalling
the latest Batman trilogy. In 2005 when Batman
Begins was released, I
thought it was a great reboot of a troubled franchise. In my opinion, I
consider The Dark Knight to be the best film of the last
decade. Needless to say, I had very high hopes and expectations for the third
film The Dark Knight Rises.
Fast forward through my first watching of that film, I didn't know what to make
of TDKR as I found it long, confusing, complicated and muddled. For the last
four weeks, while everyone was discussing 'nothing' and referential mania, I
had the characters of King Lear and Batman on my mind.
Well, as I started thinking and rereading, I began to notice some
rather intriguing parallels about King Lear and the Dark Knight. King Lear
deals with themes about justice, authority and chaos. The characters are cruel,
ignorant and blind to their own insignificance. When Lear banishes Cordelia,
her disrespectfulness, it's Kent who tells Lear that it was a mistake and he
would later regret it. Lear lashes out at Kent and banishes him as well. This
is reminiscent of a scene in The Dark Knight Rises where Alfred Pennyworth,
Bruce Wayne's loyal butler that cared for him since the death of his parents,
pleads to Bruce to give up the Batman. Bruce's body is more fragile and Alfred
does not want to bury another member of the Wayne family. Unfortunately, Bruce
Wayne's cared more about a city that had forgotten about him and dismissed
Alfred.
I think what happened is that I developed my own sort of
referential mania between King Lear and The Dark Knight Rises. Both Lear and
TDKR deal with an impending storm. Lear’s storm is literal but also a symbol to
reflect his inner turmoil that forces the king to recognize his own mortality
and frailty. In TDKR, a ‘storm’ is used to mention the impending onslaught of
villain Bane taking over the city and breaking Batman’s back, thus forcing him
to recognize his own mortality.
King Lear hands off the Kingdom to Goneril and Regan. The ending
result is turmoil and chaos throughout. Bruce Wayne foolishly hand Wayne
Enterprises over to the cunning Miranda Tate, who just happens to be working
for Bane, resulting in his takeover of Gotham City.
I also found the character of Edgar to be similar to that of Bruce
Wayne. Edgar is initially blind to the treacheries that Edmund is up
to at first, just like Bruce Wayne before he realizes that Gotham is full of
crime and on the verge of chaos. It’s really hard to characterize Edgar because
he changes so much throughout the play. I will mention that he does wear a
disguise to aid Lear and Gloucester. It’s not a cape and cowl but his disguise
is used to right his brother’s treason.
Speaking in terms of blindness, Gloucester has no idea who the mad
beggar is (Edgar) because he’s literally blind. The fact that no one in Gotham
realized Bruce Wayne was Batman, even after Bruce is considered dead and Batman
fakes his death goes to show how blind people in Gotham really are.
So maybe there’s something here, or maybe it’s just reading too
much into the play and the film. Either way, I commend you if you’ve made it
this far.
Travis
No comments:
Post a Comment